Vol. 44 (1): 163-171, January – February, 2018

doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0083


Gamal A. Alsagheer 1, Atef Fathi 1, Mohamed Sayed Abdel-Kader 1, Ahmed M. Hasan 1, Omar Mohamed 1, Osama Mahmoud 1, Ahmad Abolyosr 1
1 Department of Urology, Qena Faculty of medicine, South Valley University, Egypt


Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcome and predictors of failure of substitution urethroplasty using either dorsal onlay buccal mucosal (BM) graft or ventral onlay penile skin flap (PS) for anterior urethral stricture ≥ 8cm.

Patients and methods: Between March 2010 and January 2016, 50 patients with anterior urethral stricture ≥ 8 cm were treated at our hospital. The surgical outcome and success rate were assessed. The predictors of failure were analyzed using mul­tivariate analysis. Failure was considered when subsequent urethrotomy or urethro­plasty were needed.

Results: Dorsal onlay BM graft was carried out in 24 patients, while PS urethroplasty in 26 patients. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding patients demographics, stricture characteristics or follow-up period. One case in the BM group was lost during follow- up. Stricture recurrence was detected in 7 (30.4%) patients out of BM group while in 6 (23.1%) patients out of PS group (p value= 0.5). No significant differences between both groups regarding overall early and late complica­tions were observed. Occurrence of early complications and the stricture length were the only predictors of failure in univariate analysis, while in multivariate analysis the occurrence of early complications was only significant.

Conclusion: On short-term follow-up, both dorsal onlay BM graft and ventral onlay PS flap urethroplasty have similar success rates. However, BM graft has a potential advantage to reduce operative time and is also technically easier. The surgeon should avoid early local complications as they represent a higher risk for failure.

Keywords: Urethral Stricture; Oral Mucosal Absorption; Penis

[Full Text]